All Posts Tagged With: "detox"

Linda’s comment:  This video is simple and to the point….if you don’t care about your own health, please think about your children and grandchildren.  We know that babies are born into our world carrying 500 to 600 environmental toxins….There was a study done using 600 newborn babies within hours after birth…the blood tests results were very alarming….WATCH THIS VIDEO MORE THAN ONCE….pass it on to your grown children…show it to your place of worship…show it to everyone you can think of…This video shows hundreds of chemicals, etc., etc. etc., that are harming YOU, me and YOUR CHILDREN AND GRAND-CHILDREN….

 

What moms do not realize is their unborn child becomes the “toxic dump” for all the assaults and poor eating habits while carrying their child.  What needs to be done to help prevent or curtail these toxic loads is AT LEAST one year from becoming pregnant, the mother and father need to  clean up their bodies and consider a lifelong daily detox, prior to getting pregnant, AND after that year continue the detox. Your unborn child will have a better chance in life.

 

I personally did the wrong things when I was pregnant….I DIDN’T smoke or drink alcoholor take any medications, BUT I sucked down Diet Coke and Diet Dr Pepper and ate things that were unhealthy.  I didn’t eat organically, I took my folic, but no other supplements….I made a lot of mistakes….then I had 14 amalgams in my mouth and ALL the mercury from those amalgams were dumping DAILY into my body for my unborn child to take in as I chewed gum and ate. (the chewing of gum and foods releases on going Mercury into your bodies.  Bottom-line we are bringing children into the world who are already full of toxins and pathogens…..THIS MUST STOP…

 

This video, I hope, will bring education and awareness to all who care….even if the adults will not make the changes for themselves, make those changes for your children and grandchildren.

 

One last thing….think about those children who got “SLAMMED” with vaccinations on top of their already toxic bodies AND people wonder why we are dealing with Autism….Autism justisn’t caused by vaccinations, IMHO!!!!  However, think about it…..these babies are born with already toxic bodies, THEN they get 14 plus vaccinations within the first 2 years of their life….If you know those that are vaccinating babies, PLEASE get them to demand that those vaccinations be given ONE AT A TIME….BTW, my 30 year old daughter got her first 3 in 1 shot, got seriously ill and I said NO MORE….Yes, I took on the schools, and they backed down.  Now Arizona has 3 laws on the books to help protect parents who don’t want vaccinations….One other thing…When my daughters playmates got the chicken pox, measles, And mumps, I ran my daughter over to their house to play and get a natural exposure…..I protected her with high dosing of VitC and good children’s vitamins…PLUS, she got NO sugar…. Just be aware, if your child shows and/or showed no problems with vaccinations, they can have many problems as they go older….Don’t forget those vaccines were made and given before all the stink about nasty vaccines….KNOWLEDGE IS POWER….take charge of you own healthcare journey…some docs hate this, but alternative docs love it when you take the lead…they have a better chance of getting you well, when you lead the team….

 

What is more important than the health of your children and grand-children???

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I continue to point out that if you are bringing a new baby home, I hope all of you will first clean up the nursery and even remove lead from the painted walls, and even check the levels of outgassing of toxins from the carpets etc before you bring the baby into a suboptimal environment.

I have stressed that everyone should watch the two one hour specials from CNN.com/toxicamerica and then go to Google and search on Ten Americans and watch the video that EWG.ORG has made available showing the measurable level of toxins in everyone today.

Please click on this link and look at frequently asked questions so that you are better able to consult with patients about the benefit to risk ratio of their using stem cells to treat their condition.

Since everyone wants a magic bullet that takes away their symptoms, most will not bother to learn my FIGHT program and actually change their diet and really detox etc unless they learn that there are risks associated with stem cell therapy beyond the risk of paying that money and seeing little in the way of results.

I hope that more will first learn my FIGHT program and really do it intensively so that if they then still take stem cell therapy, they have optimized the potential that they will see lasting benefits. And, just like we can protect against some of the adverse effects of vaccines with high dose oral vitamin C, I feel that following my FIGHT program will also lower the potential for some of the adverse outcomes now starting to be reported. These may be from the inappropriate or premature use of stem cells in bodies that have not first been adequately prepared.

I hope that you understand that, for example, a heart transplant for a condition like idiopathic dilated hypertrophic myocardopathy can be associated with a mitochondrial disease. That means it would be very wise to first provide the essential nutrients like Carnitine, CO-Q, etc (my total heart program described in detail elsewhere), which often eliminates the need for the heart transplant in the first place.

However, that nutrient program in addition will maximize the potential that either a heart transplant or stem cell therapy can actually provide a lasting benefit. It is obvious that the heart transplant would fail if no one wakes up to the real diagnosis of mitochondrial disease and provides the specialized nutrients the patient really needs.  Stem cells realistically need as much help as they can get too, like all the lead and mercury out first!

And, to learn even more, the announcement below lists the names of the leaders in the field and the topics being discussed. If you Google the names of any presenter on any topic you are interested in usually you will have instant access to useful information.

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

We have all heard about the extraordinary promise that stem cell research holds for the treatment of human diseases. Clinics all over the world claim to offer stem cell treatments for a wide variety of conditions. But are all of these treatments likely to be safe and effective?

The ISSCR (International Society for Stem Cell Research) provides information to help you evaluate these claims.

Your Gateway to the International Stem Cell Community

http://www.worldstemcellsummit.com/

Don’t miss the early registration deadline — register today and save!!
The World Stem Cell Summit is the flagship international event uniting the stem cell community by bringing together scientists, patients, advocates, business people, investors, educators, ethicists, policy makers, government representatives, and others to network and learn from each other. In 2010, the Summit will attract more than 1,200 attendees from 30 nations, 60 exhibitors and more than 200 endorsing organizations and media partners from around the world. View the full agenda and join us in Detroit, Michigan USA on October 4-6.

Attendees Receive Free Copy of the 2010 World Stem Cell Report
Once again, the World Stem Cell Report will be available exclusively to all attendees of the 2010 World Stem Cell Summit! The 2010 World Stem Cell Report focuses on the theme of global harmonization, showcasing efforts of more than 40 countries, institutions, stem cell networks, think-tanks academic institutions, government agencies and companies that are working together as a global stem cell community to advance scientific research, policy and commercialization.

Stem Cell Action Awards Honorees Announced
The 6th annual Genetics Policy Institute Stem Cell Action Awards Dinner will be held on Tuesday, October 5, as part of the 2010 World Stem Cell Summit. This year’s honorees include Michigan Governor Jennifer M. Granholm; philanthropist A. Alfred Taubman; the Canadian Stem Cell Network; Stephen and Barbara Byer and the organization they founded, ALS Worldwide; and patient-advocate Laura Jackson. Space is limited so register today!

People will only see this headline and their compliance with restricting foods will plummet. You need to know your patients will not have time to read the entire article where food intolerances are explained and where the technical fact that food allergy involves IMMUNE mediated reactions.

This is a disservice to our efforts to help our patient’s health using my FIGHT program. I repeat that patients can do everything, drink best food, raise organic food picked ripe from balanced soil, exercise, detox, etc, and yet sabotage their results by ignoring the need to avoid certain foods. I admit that it is difficult to identify all food intolerances and no test is perfect. But, irresponsible reporting to sell newspapers where the full story is not told does serious disservice to the millions whose health is being adversely impacted by a food they lack the enzymes to metabolize, like lactose intolerance, which admittedly is not a food allergy but clearly is adversely affected the health of millions.

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/12/health/research/12allergies

May 11, 2010
Doubt Is Cast on Many Reports of Food Allergies
By GINA KOLATA

Many who think they have food allergies actually do not.

A new report, commissioned by the federal government, finds the field is rife with poorly done studies, misdiagnoses and tests that can give misleading results.

While there is no doubt that people can be allergic to certain foods, with reproducible responses ranging from a rash to a severe life-threatening reaction, the true incidence of food allergies is only about 8 percent for children and less than 5 percent for adults, said Dr. Marc Riedl, an author of the new paper and an allergist and immunologist at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Yet about 30 percent of the population believe they have food allergies. And, Dr. Riedl said, about half the patients coming to his clinic because they had been told they had a food allergy did not really have one.

Dr. Riedl does not dismiss the seriousness of some people’s responses to foods. But, he says, “That accounts for a small percentage of what people term ‘food allergies.’ ”
Even people who had food allergies as children may not have them as adults. People often shed allergies, though no one knows why. And sometimes people develop food allergies as adults, again for unknown reasons.

For their report, Dr. Riedl and his colleagues reviewed all the papers they could find on food allergies published between January 1988 and September 2009 — more than 12,000 articles. In the end, only 72 met their criteria, which included having sufficient data for analysis and using more rigorous tests for allergic responses.

“Everyone has a different definition” of a food allergy, said Dr. Jennifer J. Schneider Chafen of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Palo Alto Health Care System in California and Stanford’s Center for Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, who was the lead author of the new report. People who receive a diagnosis after one of the two tests most often used — pricking the skin and injecting a tiny amount of the suspect food and looking in blood for IgE antibodies, the type associated with allergies — have less than a 50 percent chance of actually having a food allergy, the investigators found.

One way to see such a reaction is with what is called a food challenge, giving people a suspect food disguised so they do not know if they are eating it or a placebo food. If the disguised food causes a reaction, the person has an allergy.

But in practice, most doctors are reluctant to use food challenges, Dr. Riedl said. They believe the test to be time consuming, and worry about asking people to consume a food, like peanuts, that can elicit a frightening response.

The paper, to be published Wednesday in The Journal of the American Medical Association, is part of a large project organized by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to try to impose order on the chaos of food allergy testing. An expert panel will provide guidelines defining food allergies and giving criteria to diagnose and manage patients. They hope to have a final draft by the end of June.

“We were approached as in a sense the honest broker who could get parties together to look at this question,” said Dr. Matthew J. Fenton, who oversees the guidelines project for the allergy institute.

Authors of the new report — and experts on the guidelines panel — say even accepted dogma, like the idea that breast-fed babies have fewer allergies or that babies should not eat certain foods like eggs for the first year of life, have little evidence behind them.
Part of the confusion is over what is a food allergy and what is a food intolerance, Dr. Fenton said. Allergies involve the immune system, while intolerances generally do not. For example, a headache from sulfites in wine is not a food allergy. It is an intolerance. The same is true for lactose intolerance, caused by the lack of an enzyme needed to digest sugar in milk.

And other medical conditions can make people think they have food allergies, Dr. Fenton said. For example, people sometimes interpret acid reflux symptoms after eating a particular food as an allergy.

The chairman of the guidelines project, Dr. Joshua Boyce, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard and an allergist and pediatric pulmonologist, said one of the biggest misconceptions some doctors and patients have is that a positive test for IgE antibodies to a food means a person is allergic to that food. It is not necessarily so, he said.

During development, he said, the immune system tends to react to certain food proteins, producing IgE antibodies. But, Dr. Boyce said, “these antibodies can be transient and even inconsequential.”

“There are plenty of individuals with IgE antibodies to various foods who don’t react to those foods at all,” Dr. Boyce said.

The higher the levels of IgE antibodies to a particular food, the greater the likelihood the person will react in an allergic way. But even then, the antibodies do not necessarily portend a severe reaction, Dr. Boyce said. Antibodies to some foods, like peanuts, are much more likely to produce a reaction than ones to other foods, like wheat or corn or rice. No one understands why.

The guidelines panel hopes its report will lead to new research as well as clarify the definition and testing for food allergies.

But for now, Dr. Fenton said, doctors should not use either the skin-prick test or the antibody test as the sole reason for thinking their patients have a food allergy.
“By themselves they are not sufficient,” Dr. Fenton said.

 

Excerpt:

Ok folks…..I don’t know how many of you attended the Webinar on FIGHT by Dr Garry Gordon today, but if you missed it you can go to www.gordonresearch.com and click on Webinar.  If you can attend the “live” presentation every Wednesday, you can wait 72 hours and go to www.gordonresearch.com and listen to the hour presentation.  Talk about getting an education.  What makes it nice is you can listen to them as many times as you like for FREE.  I guarantee you every time you listen to it, YOU WILL LEARN SOMETHING NEW.  Also, make sure you have a pad to take notes.

 

You can also come back to this blog and post any question you may have on what you have learned from the Webinar’s. 

 

Right now he is doing a series breaking down the word F.I.G.H.T….Each time you attend there is a 10% discount on at least one of the products he speaks about.  They give you a couple of weeks to order that particular product at the 10% discount.

 

Please join us and share this blog with your friends, doctors, colleagues, so they can learn how to clean up their bodies and live longer.  You won’t regret it…

 

Regards,

Linda

 

PS….I have been on the FIGHT program for 1 1/2 years now and I can’t shout it loud enough how much better you will feel.  What is important to me and to the folks I coach is knowing the products in the FIGHT program are balanced, good ingredients, packaged under the “best conditions” stored and transported under the “best conditions”…..