Monsanto GMO foods are causing symptoms like allergies, asthma, weight problems, serious digestive disorders, arthritis, autoimmune diseases, and anxiety. By just eliminating all GMO foods some of these issues to responded.

I somehow feel that in the future we will need community gardens or some way to affordable get real food for people again. Just look at Mark Hyman’s wildly successful weight loss and improved glucose control etc. in people if they stop all wheat and dairy.

Now, in addition, Russell Blaylock’s current news letter reports that dairy, particularly skim milk, is the biggest risk factor for prostate cancer. What have we done to our food supply?

Sincerely,

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

From: David Ponsonby
http://vitalitymagazine.com/article/dramatic-health-recoveries-reported/

Dramatic Health Recoveries Reported By Patients Who Took Their Doctor’s Advice and Stopped Using GMO Foods
by Jeffrey M. Smith

Are genetically modified (GM) foods making you sick – I mean really sick? Up until recently, all that we could say was thank goodness you’re not a lab rat; GM feed messes them up big time. GMOs (genetically modified organisms) appear to trigger the immune systems of both mice and rats as if they were under attack. In addition, the gastrointestinal system is adversely affected, animals age more quickly, and vital organs are damaged.

Dr. Gordon’s Comments:

How to prove Mercury’s relationship to health problems in the population? Is it more crucial than the lead toxicity we all have today? If treatment was as affordable as food or water, is there anyone who would not benefit from Lead and Mercury lowering therapy?

What is the determining factor in who gets treatment since total body
levels of lead are now understood to require tissue testing such as bone lead levels to really appreciate? Is there any affordable safe way to really know how much total mercury is in specific tissues or how much more toxic mercury becomes when we have low levels of selenium or high levels of lead? What about the fact that some genetic types hold on to new mercury ingested, as when eating fish, 4 times as long as others eating that same serving of fish?

This IAOMT announcement about upcoming FDA hearings about dental mercury is useful, as the link at the bottom of this email provides you with a heavily referenced and quite current report from a large Canadian company SNC Lavalin on mercury toxicity. It is clearly very authoritative and worth you knowing more about particularly since the world still believe the nonsense that cholesterol lowering is a far more worthy goal for our nation’s healthcare dollars than meaningful effort to lower lead or mercury. SNC-Lavalin has maintained its momentum in internal development, acquisitions and affiliations and has become a world leader in a number of sectors such as agrifood, aluminum, biopharmaceuticals, chemicals and petroleum, the environment, facilities and operations management, infrastructure, mass transit, mining and metallurgy and power.

Since medical boards too, like the general public, have little or no interest in the adverse effects we are all suffering today from these and other toxins in our water food and air, this report makes it clear they need to learn more! It is sad that anyone with most mental health problems is seen as drug deficient. No effort is made by any major medical center to look for either environmental toxicities or nutrient deficiencies, while they prescribe dangerous drugs like antidepressants to already toxic and poorly nourished patients where even simple use of OMEGA 3 supplements would make a meaningful difference.

This gives you a detailed analysis of mercury, which focuses more on the dental implications of mercury amalgam sources and less on environmental sources like power plants and industry but nonetheless mercury issues are rampant in our country and almost no one is doing anything meaningful about it. If you read this carefully you will see how difficult it has been to tie down exactly the difference between adverse effects discernable in children’s health receiving porcelain filling vs. mercury amalgam fillings. Maybe they need multifactorial analysis and must recognize the adverse effects from Lead and Omega 3 deficiencies and even adverse effects of GMO foods and excessive prescribing of antibiotics. Once they factor all of that in, they will have a realistic understanding of what has happened to our children’s health and will see that in unhealthy people, the effects of dental amalgam alone may be hard to tease out without significantly extending the length of the study and the number or participants and that all costs money.

SNC-Lavalin’s report still leaves many questions unanswered. What if you read the report by Mark Ulman about increasing levels of mercury in our environment?  How do you assign blame for the mercury toxicity? Is coal burning more the chief culprit or, as in the case of lead, is it just industrialization causing the lead to leave the earth’s surface and wind up entering our bodies with a big increase due to Ethyl Corporation with leaded gas?

But when will we have the data that will enable everyone to conclude that lowering lead and mercury is far more vital for the preservation of life as we know it, than wasting billions on lowering cholesterol with a minor anti-inflammation side benefit? What price would a therapy have to drop to, for us to start taking lead and mercury out of everyone?

Would zeolite, or some advanced forms of fiber (I prefer Beyond Fiber) 
or Vitamin C that was well enough tolerated to be taken in regular doses of 8+ Grams, like BIOEN’R-G’Y C, all be contenders if you were the surgeon general of the head of HHS/NIH/CDC/FDA/EPA what would you be willing to recommend to seriously change the health of our nation?  Maybe to keep big Pharma happy, we could develop other chelators that could be patented?

The question I am asking is IF THE THERAPY IS ENTIRELY SAFE, HOW CHEAP
WOULD IT HAVE TO BE for it to be made as widely available as say salt
and pepper? If something that would lower the levels of heavy metals were cheap would all this nonsense about who needs chelation for heavy metals be mute?  As if the treatment were as affordable as milk or bread, is there anyone that would not be getting a benefit?  The
Archives Of Internal Medicine published years ago their study
documenting that ALL causes of morbidity and mortality are directly tied to how low your lead levels are over a lifetime. So, in the final analysis, whose job is it to define treatment levels for a population the size of the American public?

Someone at NIH, who we later discovered was on the take, was willing to set the recommended levels of cholesterol for our entire population. Now the issue is if treatment is going to cost say $3000 per person
then the answers to who is going to get treatment to lower lead and
mercury becomes more complex. Then, we all want someone else to pay for
it.  Maybe the ADA or power plants or health insurance?  Now we get the game going who needs treatment and for how long? The answer still is EVERYONE and for a LIFETIME but obviously cost is what is making this topic have proponents and opponents and therein we can have controversy for many more years. 

I am convinced we all need to get the lead and mercury out and this
reference may assist you in coming to your conclusion, along with the
many others I have sent to FACT members in past and incorporate into my
lectures around the world and into a webinar on heavy metals.

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com 

Link: http://iaomt.org/articles/category_view.asp?intReleaseID=329&catid=30

Excerpt:

Amalgam Risk Assessments 2010

On December 14 and 15, 2010, the FDA will convene a scientific panel to re-examine the issue of mercury exposure from amalgam dental fillings. Two private foundations, assisted by IAOMT, have commissioned G. Mark Richardson, PhD, of SNC Lavallin, Ottawa, Canada, formerly of Health Canada, to provide the scientific panel and FDA regulators with a formal risk assessment using the latest information from the scientific literature.  Previously published risk assessments dated from the 1990’s.  Meanwhile, newer studies have uncovered more toxicity produced by lower levels of mercury exposure, and various government agencies have been reducing their allowed exposure levels. 

The final work is presented here in two parts.  

Part 1 is titled UPDATING EXPOSURE, REEXAMINING REFERENCE EXPOSURE LEVELS, AND CRITICALLY EVALUATING RECENT STUDIES.  “…it was determined that some 67.2 million Americans would exceed the Hg dose associated with the REL of 0.3 ug/m3 established by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1995, whereas 122.3 million Americans would exceed the dose associated with the REL of 0.03 ug/m3 established by the California Environmental Protection Agency in 2008.”

Part 2 is titled CUMULATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND JOINT TOXICITY: MERCURY VAPOR, METHYL MERCURY AND LEAD.  “A large proportion – 1/3rd – of the US population is concurrently exposed to Hg0, methyl Hg and Pb on a daily basis. The weight of available evidence suggests that risks posed by concurrent exposure to combinations of these 3 substances should be assessed as additive.”

Dr. Arpad Pusztai was an enthusiastic supporter of genetic engineering working on cutting edge safety research, until he discovered the dangerous truth exactly twelve years ago. In Part 1, Jeffrey Smith recounts his dramatic story and why we all owe Dr. Pusztai a debt of gratitude.

Exposing Biotech Propaganda

And don’t miss Part 2, where Jeffrey responds point-by-point to the biotech industry’s spin of the Pusztai affair, which is still being hyped in their new attack website. This is the first in a series of rebuttals to the website’s attack of Genetic Roulette (as promised).

Read the Blog

In its never-ending attempt to fabricate “mental disorders” out of every human activity, the psychiatric industry is now pushing the most ridiculous disease they’ve invented yet: Healthy eating disorder.

This is no joke: If you focus on eating healthy foods, you’re “mentally diseased” and probably need some sort of chemical treatment involving powerful psychotropic drugs. The Guardian newspaper reports, “Fixation with healthy eating can be sign of serious psychological disorder” and goes on to claim this “disease” is called orthorexia nervosa — which is basically just Latin for “nervous about correct eating.”

But they can’t just called it “nervous healthy eating disorder” because that doesn’t sound like they know what they’re talking about. So they translate it into Latin where it sounds smart (even though it isn’t). That’s where most disease names come from: Doctors just describe the symptoms they see with a name like osteoporosis (which means “bones with holes in them”).

Getting back to this fabricated “orthorexia” disease, the Guardian goes on to report, “Orthorexics commonly have rigid rules around eating. Refusing to touch sugar, salt, caffeine, alcohol, wheat, gluten, yeast, soya, corn and dairy foods is just the start of their diet restrictions. Any foods that have come into contact with pesticides, herbicides or contain artificial additives are also out.”

Wait a second. So attempting to avoid chemicals, dairy, soy and sugar now makes you a mental health patient? Yep. According to these experts. If you actually take special care to avoid pesticides, herbicides and genetically modified ingredients like soy and sugar, there’s something wrong with you.

But did you notice that eating junk food is assumed to be “normal?” If you eat processed junk foods laced with synthetic chemicals, that’s okay with them. The mental patients are the ones who choose organic, natural foods, apparently.

What is “normal” when it comes to foods?
I told you this was coming. Years ago, I warned NaturalNews readers that an attempt might soon be under way to outlaw broccoli because of its anti-cancer phytonutrients. This mental health assault on health-conscious consumers is part of that agenda. It’s an effort to marginalize healthy eaters by declaring them to be mentally unstable and therefore justify carting them off to mental institutions where they will be injected with psychiatric drugs and fed institutional food that’s all processed, dead and full of toxic chemicals.

The Guardian even goes to the ridiculous extreme of saying, “The obsession about which foods are “good” and which are “bad” means orthorexics can end up malnourished.”

If your email program does not recognize the URL as a link,
copy the entire URL and paste it into your Web browser. ]]> http://lymebook.com/fight/a-note-from-linda/feed/ 0 http://lymebook.com/fight/new-challenge-to-chronic-fatigue-virus/ http://lymebook.com/fight/new-challenge-to-chronic-fatigue-virus/#respond Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:36:51 +0000 http://lymebook.com/fight/?p=962 AAAS article on most recent XMRV study

 In their publication “Science Now.”  Hedging their bets?

Linda’s comment: So as I see it, it is just another pathogen that chronically ill people need to deal with….Is it really a virus, parasite, bacterial?????  Don’t feed it, get on the FIGHT program and stop it in its track. All of these critters like the spirochete love feeding off GMO, toxic chemical sweeteners, heavy metals, etc., etc., etc.,  This gives them their energies/food supply to wreak havoc on our bodies.  Healthy people have an advantage over chronic illness.  The FIGHT program is one of the best prevention programs I have ever experienced.

Listen up as the XMRV is just one of many new things that are attacking our bodies.  Scientists are having a difficult time keeping up with all the new tragedies attacking our bodies because of our toxic environments.

Excerpt:

A theory linking chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) to an infectious mouse virus known as XMRV has taken a second major hit. First proposed last October in Science, the virus-CFS connection was quickly challenged by a British group. Now a second team of British virologists reports that, after examining tissue from 170 CFS patients, they have failed to find evidence of XMRV.

Patients with CFS often report that their condition–a mix of symptoms including unexplained pains and excessive fatigue–began after an otherwise normal viral infection. And scientists in the past have preliminarily linked CFS to a few viruses. However, those links have fallen apart under scrutiny, and without a firm biological cause for CFS, victims continue to face skepticism that their condition is a “real” disease.

Full article: http://www.naturalnews.com/027854_organic_food_nutrition.html

Excerpt:

NaturalNews) Organic produce is nutritionally superior to so-called “conventional” produce, according to a comprehensive review conducted by researchers from the University of Aix-Marseille for the French food agency (AFSSA) and published in the journal Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

“This critical literature review indicates that organic agriculture, as developed until now, has the potential to produce high-quality products with some relevant improvements in terms of anti-oxidant phytomicronutrients, nitrate accumulation in vegetables and toxic residue levels,” the researchers wrote.

To be recognized as “organic,” a food product must be produced without the use of genetic modification or chemical fertilizers or pesticides, and must promote sustainable cropping methods. In the United States, organically produced meat and dairy must be raised without the use of synthetic growth hormones or antibiotics. Hormones and antibiotics are banned in animal production across the board in the European Union.

In the 2010 growing season Monsanto plans to unleash its latest Frankenfood experiment on the American and Canadian public, a new version of genetically mutated corn with eight abnormal gene traits called Genuity SmartStax corn. It is the culmination of an astonishing scandal that has been steadily building over the past decade. During this time Monsanto’s mutated seeds have grown to 90% of the U.S. soy crop and 85% of the corn crop – and wheat is next on their agenda. Their efforts have been marked by corporate bullying and have drawn the attention of the Justice Department who is conducting an antitrust investigation. All the while they have been spending millions on lobbying to fast track their agenda before the American public even realizes what hit them. Monsanto is making an ominous power play to corner the worldwide market on food and seeds. In the process they are adversely altering the very nature of food itself.

Few people would eat Monsanto’s “food” if they understood what it was or knew that they were eating it. President Obama and his family won’t eat it. Neither did the Bush family. Even a Monsanto employee cafeteria rejects it. This is no laughing matter. Your health and the health of your children and grandchildren are at stake. It seems more like a scene from a horror flick than something happening in modern day America. Imagine your digestive tract turned into a Roundup Ready herbicide factory and other warped genetic signals slowly and progressively rotting away your health. Unlike acute food poisoning from infectious E.coli, it is a slow and insidious poisoning.