prostate – F.I.G.H.T for your health! http://lymebook.com/fight Linda Heming describes her Lyme disease healing journey Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:54:37 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25 PSA Testing http://lymebook.com/fight/psa-testing/ http://lymebook.com/fight/psa-testing/#respond Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:25:18 +0000 http://lymebook.com/fight/?p=2988 Linda’s comment:  FINALLY,” It is now official that PSA testing, as now used, is wasting time and money and accomplishing nothing! This study shows then that current prostate cancer treatments are also largely useless!”
Dr. Gordon’s comments:
It is now official that PSA testing, as now used, is wasting time and money and accomplishing nothing! This study shows then that current prostate cancer treatments are also largely useless! This could be the beginning of the end for mainstream cancer treatment.

We already knew that breast cancer treatment is failing. We have lots of data showing mammograms do more harm than good and radiation is not helpful for most breast cancer patients and axillary lymph node dissection does more harm than good. Now men are learning that the nonsense of removing your prostate and radiating it and using all the drugs they are given, all of which destroys any quality of life, and is not making a big difference over doing nothing.

Now we have an official report that prostate cancer treatment based on PSA is a total waste of time. The urologists will be very upset to lose their lucrative racket. No man likes to live with the fact that he has prostate cancer so it is easy to talk them into all kinds of useless and dangerous treatments, no matter how devastating the side effects of surgery are.

Amazingly no one ever mentions how easy it is to bring PSA into safe ranges and keep it there for life with the FIGHT program, as documented by Dr Kobayashi in his ten year World without Cancer study! That approach makes no money for specialists and is just too simple for our radiation oncologists and surgeons to recommend. The simple ideas that by exercising, and lowering stress, stop smoking, simplify diet, get more sleep, use some natural products to boost immune function will provide a far better outcome than surgery radiation and chemo just does not have widespread appeal.

All we need to do is get on prostate support herbs like Saw Palmetto, PYGEUM, etc. and, if really motivated to get healthy, take my Power Drink and Beyond Chelation-Improved and use some Far Infra Red Sauna treatments to help get toxins out. There is no future in that for our big prostate cancer industry; they will continue to lie and pretend that the cancer is just in the prostate area.

The Johnson and Johnson cancer blood test continues to find those prostate cancer cells in the peripheral blood. In one study, in 2/3 of the patients who had been told that their cancer was only in the prostate so removing it would eliminate their cancer for once and always, that was not true. As we know cancer is a systemic disease and needs systemic treatment, as Kobayashi proved in Tokyo.

Cancer screening tests are very useful if we keep the patients out of the hands of the surgeons, oncologists, and radiologists. Abnormal tests go back to healthy ranges and stay there if the patient is on an adequate health promoting program. The PSA test, properly used, rewards patients for taking better care of themselves, but with the tendency of patients to not accept the fact that by age 60 sixty percent of men have prostate cancer that will not kill them, they are suckers for doing something , particularly since insurance pays for it. Doctors do little to warn them about how inconvenient incontinence and impotence are for the rest of their life. They need to know that aggressive treatment is not extending their life, so why not focus on getting healthy and doing the exercise and life style changes that do work every time and do help keep PSA levels in healthy ranges.

Prostate treatments are shown to have problems but most patients will not be told about the lack of proven benefit from aggressive treatment but you need to let them know that this committee found PSA testing is useless, as currently used by mainstream medicine. The interventions they recommend can lead to infections, impotence and incontinence so critics say the risks of testing often outweigh the benefits.

My detox based FIGHT program has no downside and is relevant to all age-related chronic diseases. We can bring most cancer screening tests into safer, healthier ranges using my FIGHT program, which is based on ten years of work by Dr Kobayashi where none of the 10,000 subjects died of cancer. His paper is called World without Cancer and is on my website www.gordonresearch.com.

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

The Wall Street Journal

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204294504576615572596987098.html?mod=djemHL_t

•OCTOBER 7, 2011
Panel Faults Widely Used Prostate-Cancer Test

BY JENNIFER CORBETT DOOREN AND THOMAS M. BURTON

A key federal advisory panel is poised to recommend that healthy men shouldn’t be screened with a widely used blood test for prostate cancer, indicating that the test offers more harm than benefit.

]]>
http://lymebook.com/fight/psa-testing/feed/ 0
Secrets of Novel Retrovirus Unfolding http://lymebook.com/fight/secrets-of-novel-retrovirus-unfolding/ http://lymebook.com/fight/secrets-of-novel-retrovirus-unfolding/#respond Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:46:08 +0000 http://lymebook.com/fight/?p=873

Videos from the Conference:
http://www.ifarablo g.org/

http://www.medpaget oday.com/ MeetingCoverage/ CROI/18610
CROI: Secrets of Novel Retrovirus Unfolding

By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: February 21, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – The mystery surrounding a retrovirus recently implicated
in prostate cancer and possibly chronic fatigue syndrome is beginning to
yield clues.

The virus, known as XMRV, has been confirmed to replicate primarily in
reproductive organs and lymphoid tissue, according to a primate study
reported at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.

A second study found markers that could be the key to developing an
assay for the large scale epidemiologic studies needed to determine how
widely the virus has penetrated in the population, and what effect it has.

“We’re at a very, very early stage working with this virus,” said
conference vice-chair John Coffin, PhD, of Tufts University in
Boston.Action Points
Note that these studies were published as abstracts and presented at a
conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be
preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
He likened it to the early days of HIV research, when scientists
scrambled to make sense of the virus, but cautioned that has yet to be
any clear evidence linking it to disease.

XMRV burst onto the scene four years ago when researchers doing a broad
sweep for viruses in prostate cancer samples turned up evidence of a
retrovirus that resembled the murine leukemia virus, earning it the
abbreviation xenotropic murine leukemia-related virus (XMRV).

“The similarity [in genetic sequence] is so striking that although we
don’t know the details we have to assume it’s coming from mice,” Stephen
Goff, PhD, of Columbia University in New York City, told MedPage Today.

The genetic sequence of all XMRV isolates tested across the country, and
across diseases, show so little divergence that the virus must have only
recently jumped to humans — likely from a point source and with limited
numbers of replication cycles during transmission, Goff said in a
plenary lecture on XMRV at the conference.

This implies that a vaccine might be much easier to develop than for
HIV, he explained at a press conference.

However, while this class of retroviruses appears to be characterized by
lifelong infection that cannot be cleared by the immune system, there’s
no clear proof yet that XMRV causes illness or the diseases it’s been
linked to, he emphasized.

Even the links to prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome are
controversial, with centers reporting anywhere from 0% to 23% and 0% to
67% prevalence in tested cases, respectively, Goff noted.

To learn more about how the virus might interact with the human immune
system, scientists at the Cleveland Clinic, Yerkes National Primate
Research Center at Emory University, and Abbott Diagnostics collaborated
on an animal model.

Prachi Sharma, PhD, of Emory, presented part of the results involving
monkeys.

She reported that acutely infected monkeys tested positive for virus
replicating in a number of tissues.

Chronic infection, though, appeared largely limited to CD4+ T cells in
lymphoid organs — spleen, lymph nodes, and GI tract — as well as in
reproductive organs, including prostate, testes, ovaries, vagina, and
cervix.

Other experimental lab studies have shown the virus to be androgen and
hormone responsive, which bears on the cell types in which it will be
found, Goff said.

It was notable that the monkeys exhibited no visible symptoms or fever
when infected, said John Hackett, Jr., PhD, of Abbott Diagnostics in
Abbott Park, Ill.

He reported the group’s efforts to develop assays to detect XMRV infections.

In the monkeys, antibodies to gag p30, env gp70 and env p15E were observed.

The researchers were also able to show, for the first time, the
existence of antibodies to multiple XMRV proteins in humans.

However, they occured in only three of 2,851 human blood samples.

Detection in humans has proven challenging, but whether this reflects
the virus’ life cycle, a combination of viral properties and the length
of time between infection and disease, or some other factor is unclear,
Hackett said.

“Part of it is the ability to identify it to begin with,” Hackett told
MedPage Today. “You could argue we haven’t been looking for it.”

Sharma’s study was supported by Abbott Diagnostics and a grant from the
National Institutes of Health.

Hackett reported conflicts of interest with Abbott Diagnostics.

Goff reported support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the
Department of Defense Prostate Program.

Primary source: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections

Source reference:
Goff S “Mouse to Man? XMRV and Human Disease” CROI 2010; Abstract 132.

Additional source: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
Source reference:
Qui X, et al “XMRV: Examination of Viral Kinetics, Tissue Tropism, and
Serological Markers of Infection” CROI 2010; Abstract 151.

Additional source: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
Source reference:
Sharma P, et al “Organ and Cell Lineage Dissemination of XMRV in Rhesus
Macaques during Acute and Chronic Infection” CROI 2010; Abstract 150 LB.

]]>
http://lymebook.com/fight/secrets-of-novel-retrovirus-unfolding/feed/ 0