Full article: http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article098.htm

Excerpt:

I’ve got a copy of the Doctor’s Data v Barrett Federal lawsuit attached to this article.  Be careful when you handle it – it’s HOT…

I was kind of mad at Darryl Hickok, the head of Doctor’s Data laboratory a few months ago, for not walking out and legally punching sleazebag Stephen Barrett, and his minions, in the face over their obvious intent to destroy Doctor’s Data, and hence, a whole host of great US Doctors, with their activities. 

For, as I constantly point out to people, there is only one way to deal with Barrett and his slimy ilk – you have to, so to speak, slap them, and whack them, and kick them, and stomp them, yank their pants down and paddle them publicly – every time.  It is the only thing that works.

But then Doctor’s Data, on June 18th, 2010 came out with a forty-one page Federal Lawsuit against Barrett, et al, which, in war terms, makes me say, quoting the famous line from one of my favorite movies of all time “Apocalypse Now”,  “I love the smell of napalm in the morning…”

War is something that inevitably happens to humanity.  There are a lot of reasons why it occurs, not the least of which is oppression. In war, when you have to do it, you must win – and do so in a way that discourages, for a reasonable amount of time, the enemy from doing to you whatever it was that made you so angry in the first place.  One of those ways is to give the enemy a strong message, delivered in a way that will cause them to re-think the error of their ways. 

Will the San Diego Federal Judge Put Stephen Barrett in Jail?…

 

Monday June 7th, 2010

 

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

 

Oh my, the “Barrett Settlement” story, http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article091.htm
Will the San Diego Federal Judge Put Stephen Barrett in Jail?.. in San Diego, is getting even better.  It seems that now the Federal judge in the case has assigned a Federal Magistrate Judge, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo “to retain jurisdiction for settlement purposes.”

 

Wow – this could could get interesting.  VERY interesting.  I’ll explain.

 

I have a copy, right here on my desk, of the settlement statement wording agreed to, and ORDERED by the Court, and so far, I don’t see that wording on Barrett’s website, nor do I see his minions mouthing those COURT ORDERED words.  Apparently they must all be in shock and cannot bring themselves to comply with the Court Order.

 

And NO, I’m not going to tell you what those COURT ORDERED words are.  http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article091.htm
 
I’m going to wait and see what happens.  Frankly, I hope Barrett decides to defy the Federal Magistrate Judge.  Then Negrete can file for an Order of Contempt.  Being called on the carpet in front of a Federal Judge could have serious consequences for Barrett.

 

Contempt, in a Federal court, is taken very seriously.  Below is the official definition:     

 

CONTEMPT OF COURT
Any willful disobedience to, or disregard of, a court order or any misconduct in the presence of a court; action that interferes with a judge’s ability to administer justice or that insults the dignity of the court; punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. There are both civil and criminal contempts; the distinction is often unclear.

 

Contempt Of Court – Civil Or Criminal
A judge who feels someone is improperly challenging or ignoring the court’s authority has the power to declare the defiant person (called the contemnor) in contempt of court. There are two types of contempt, criminal and civil. Criminal contempt occurs when the contemnor actually interferes with the ability of the court to function properly – for example, by yelling at the judge. This is also called direct contempt because it occurs directly in front of the judge. A criminal contemnor may be fined, jailed or both as punishment for his act.

 

Civil contempt occurs when the contemnor willfully disobeys a court order. This is also called indirect contempt because it occurs outside the judge’s immediate realm and evidence must be presented to the judge to prove the contempt. A civil contemnor, too, may be fined, jailed or both. The fine or jailing is meant to coerce the contemnor into obeying the court, not to punish him, and the contemnor will be released from jail just as soon as he complies with the court order. In family law, civil contempt is one way a court enforces alimony, child support, custody and visitation orders which have been violated.

 

However, many courts have realized that, at least regarding various procedural matters such as appointment of counsel, the distinction between civil and criminal contempt is often blurred and uncertain.

I Love Being Hated by Quackbusters…

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

New Orleans area doctor James Carter MD, PhD, author of the famous book “Racketeering in Medicine,” the blatant 1994 expose of the plot to destroy innovation in US health care, called me up one day, several years back, and asked me if I was coming to a certain health convention where he was going to be.

He had me worried for a minute, for I thought that he might be angry at me for I had recently removed him as the “most hated person in quackbuster land,” and inserted myself into that position.  After all, there is honor, in certain important circles, in being on Stephen Barrett’s website.  The thinking is that the more space you get on Barrett’s sleazy pages the more good you must be doing for humanity.  Barrett was giving me lots of space – more than anyone had ever gotten.  I was worried that Jim Carter might be upset with me for pushing him into second position.

But he wasn’t.  He wanted me to come and speak to a large group of cutting-edge doctors and he wanted to introduce me personally.  Barrett has no idea, to this day, how much of an honor he had bestowed on me.  I spent a weekend with a group of people who lead the nation, if not the world, in innovative health care thinking.  It was, to say the least, stimulating.

Jim Carter, with his immense book, had taken the high road in his expose, even suffering through a lawsuit over the book, from Barrett – which Jim won.  I, on the other hand, took the low road, and called bullyboy Barrett out into the street, so to speak, where I proceeded to slap him around, bloody him up, in front of his own audience.  I took Barrett’s very own tactics and played them right back at him – and rubbed his nose in it.

Barrett, of course, being the arrogant wanna-be tyrant he actually is, couldn’t take it and sued me – or, I should say “sort of sued me,” for, as we all know it has been NINE YEARS since Barrett announced on his sleazy website that he was suing me – and of course, the Court has since thrown out the case (after eight-and-a-half years) of no activity.

There is no question that Barrett, and his band of loser malcontents, hold me, Tim Bolen, out as Public Enemy Number One.

Ahhhh, that feels good…  The only thing I could think of that would be better than that would be a personally signed Christmas Card from the Pope thanking me for my good works on the side of “Good” in the war against “Evil” – something my Mom would, definitely, put on the refrigerator.

So – What’s next?

Is there more coming?  Oh yeah.

Stay tuned…

Tim Bolen – Consumer Advocate