Large differences between test strategies for Lyme

Link: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?bfrom=pubmed&id=21271270&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

Excerpt:

We investigated the influence of assay choice on the results in a two-tier
testing algorithm for the detection of anti-Borrelia antibodies.

Eighty-nine serum samples from clinically well-defined patients were tested in eight
different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) systems based on whole-cell
antigens, whole-cell antigens supplemented with VlsE and assays using
exclusively recombinant proteins.

A subset of samples was tested in five immunoblots: one whole-cell blot, one
whole-cell blot supplemented with VlsE and three recombinant blots.

The number of IgM- and/or IgG-positive ELISA results in
the group of patients suspected of Borrelia infection ranged from 34 to 59%.

The percentage of positives in cross-reactivity controls ranged from 0 to 38%.

Comparison of immunoblots yielded large differences in inter-test agreement and
showed, at best, a moderate agreement between tests.

***Remarkably, some immunoblots gave positive results in samples that had been
tested negative by all eight ELISAs.***

The percentage of positive blots following a positive ELISA
result depended heavily on the choice of ELISA-immunoblot combination.

We conclude that the assays used to detect anti-Borrelia antibodies have widely
divergent sensitivity and specificity.