All Posts Tagged With: "EPA"

Vaccine dangers

Linda’s comment:  Vaccines lack the proven efficacy that every assumes exists…we need to help educate patients.

Dr. Gordon’s comments:

Vaccines really can contribute to serious illnesses, much more often than you realize, as they set the stage for autoimmune disease in anyone with underlying issues, like the 600,000 children EPA says are born with mercury toxicity and the huge number that are born with genetic issues that lower their ability to detox.

Vaccines lack the proven efficacy that everyone assumes exists. Here is a well organized site that can help educate patients and that has some well credentialed voices lending their credibility to help spread the word. It will be a voice for truth about the terrible benefit to risk ratio around vaccine use that you must learn if we are ever going to stop the barbaric practices going on today. http://wisvic.org/TheMainEvents.aspx

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com
Excerpt:
1. Industrial exposure to mercury is significant and mostly comes from coal burning (220 million pounds a year) and chlor-alkali plants.
2. The main ways that humans are exposed to mercury are from contaminated fish and dental amalgams or silver fillings.
3. Mercury can affect nearly all your organs, especially the brain, heart, kidneys, and guts.

Rule on Lead Safety Set to Take Effect

Dr. Gordon’s comments:

LEAD is again being recognized for the persistent danger it represents.

No one dares discuss the levels of lead we are born with being 1000 times higher than just 400 years ago or the proven fact that is DOES REAL HARM, as the higher it is the more heart attacks there are and the sooner you develop cataracts. All found in studies from Harvard and CDC that everyone has this massive load of lead in bones when we are born and it just gets worse every time we breath, as particulates in the air from coal burning as far away as China are giving us Lead and Mercury.

Somehow, this does not make anyone excited, as statins are so much easier to focus on and what your cholesterol level is fits our 5-7 minute office visit demands. Yet statements like this are regularly appearing in newspapers like the New York Times that reminds some of us that Ritalin deficiency is not the correct diagnosis. Of course this extends to Autism, Dementia and all causes of morbidity and mortality and bones take adults 15 years to remodel and no chelator gets it out faster, as only soft tissue stores are readily chelatable.

So bone lead must come out slowly by pushing out more lead each day than we take in by living, breathing, drinking, and eating by using oral chelators and fiber and high dose ascorbic acid and properly designed Zeolite products daily for life.

Of course anyone who is pregnant today is pushing the lead from their body into the fetus. So no where on planet earth is anyone born without their 1000 times elevation of bone lead, which at menopause slowly is released, as bone loss occurs leading to Hypertension, Fatigue, Dementia, etc. So this EPA regulation is too little too late but better than nothing, as some may learn that getting the lead out is a worthwhile activity.

Here it is in the NY TIMES and similar information is seen all the time but it all misses the mark by a mile!!

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

Full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/09/health/09lead.html?scp=1&sq=lead%20and%20EPA&st=cse

Excrept:

After almost two decades of delays, the Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday that it was on track to implement a regulation requiring the construction industry to help prevent cases of lead poisoning among children.
The agency said it expected more than 125,000 renovation and remodeling contractors to be trained and certified in lead-safe work practices by April 22, when the new regulation takes effect.

Under the rule, workers would have to take steps like containing their work area with plastic and conducting a thorough cleanup of lead paint dust stirred up during construction activity, which federal officials say is partly to blame for about 120,000 cases of elevated lead levels in children younger than 6 each year. Congress passed legislation in 1992 directing the E.P.A. to propose the regulation, but the agency did not finish the rule until 2008, after environmental and public interest groups filed a lawsuit to pressure the agency to issue it.  Some environmental groups are now pushing to make the rule tougher, while builders are warning their clients that it will inevitably increase construction costs. The rule applies to work performed in homes and buildings occupied by children, including schools and day care centers built before lead paint was banned in 1978.  E.P.A. officials said on Thursday that with a housing stock of about 38 million units that are potentially affected by the rule, they expect it to produce results. 

ACS 200 & ACZ Nano

Linda’s comment:  I personally can not live without my ACS200 and ACZnano Zeolite….I go so far as to carry a bottle of each in my purse….
CS basic technology goes to the head of the class of effective antimicrobials for topical applications. Many of you are still not convinced that ACS 200 is the breakthrough technology in colloidal silver chemistry that we have been telling you. Please understand the principals behind ACS 200 did not get EPA approval, as a sterilant easily. This is a multi-billion dollar market making what you do about treating patients who have infections of only passing interest to investors who have put up the money to get this sterilant product approved in a highly competitive environment.

That same knowledge base brought out the Total Body Detox with ACS 200 and ACZ. These are so easy to use that if you begin to believe that your patient’s toxins are part of their health problem, you owe it to them to let them try this convenient easy, gentle, lower dose form of ZEOLITE suitable for every age, including during pregnancy and for all pets.

Remember only when you lower the total body burden of toxins do you really deal with inflammation at the core. Only then can any chelator or Zeolite detox program begin to show its true potential. With the numbers on their website supporting the fact that mercury is really being removed with the easy affordable Total Body Detox Program.

When you have a surface that must remain sterile, whether on board a cruise ship kitchen or an operating room or a dentist office, this will be the sterilant that will set the standard for a long time.  It has additional molecules to enable it to deal with dangerous surfaces like our nation’s capitol after the anthrax exposure.

With this product no building will be needlessly closed for days, weeks or months like the post office where the anthrax was shipped from with a clean-up bill in the millions.

This is vital information for you if you believe there is something to my FIGHT program and you want to eliminate the needless deaths in over 100,000 people each year where no antibiotic would work. ACS alone would have made a huge difference and with my infection program by adding VIT A, D, C, Garlic immune support etc, as clearly described on my website under infection protocols.

We should be able to save over 90% who otherwise will die with the standard drugs being used today. It is never too late to add ACS and ACZ topically and orally, the drugs will not be damaged by adding Silver. And, now we have ANTIFUNGAL ANTIVIRAL and ANTIBIOTIC effects that are real without exception even HIV, Hepatitis and Lyme!!!

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H)
President, Gordon Research Institute
www.gordonresearch.com

http://www.resultsrna.com/products/steriplex_health_care_now_epa_approved.php

STERIPLEX Health Care Now EPA Approved
By David Larson, President

Powered by the leading silver technology utilized by Advanced Cellular Silver (ACS) 200®, STERIPLEX® Health Care is now the most powerful Sporicide/ Sterilant ever approved by the EPA.

As germs like MRSA, C. diff. and anthrax become increasingly life-threatening, the war on superbugs continues as biotechnology companies from around the world race to produce products that kill germs effectively, without harming people or the environment. And while consumers become ever more aware of product safety, harsh chemical disinfectants are out; safe and effective is definitely in.

STERIPLEX® Health Care (HC) is a revolutionary new Sterilant/Sporicide, which has recently received Federal EPA Registration. A paradigm shift in infection control STERIPLEX® Health Care sets new standards, killing spores in a tiny fraction of the time of competing products while remaining safe to people and the environment. Independent GLP certified laboratories have verified that STERIPLEX® Health Care destroys the most virulent pathogens including C. sporogenes and B. subtilis spores 10 to 32 times faster than other sterilant brands. With never before seen kill times, these results are truly remarkable as virulent spores are truly some of the toughest germs to kill. A sporicide will typically destroy all other germ species as well.

And just how safe is safe? STERIPLEX® Health Care is completely non-toxic, non-corrosive, non-flammable and 100% biodegradable. STERIPLEX® Health Care can safely be used as a not critical care instrument soak and to disinfect all hard surfaces. Competing sterilants have performance problems and/or serious corrosion and toxic side effects. For example, Glutaraldehyde is a widely used sterilant in medical facilities, but it is highly toxic. Because of its many adverse side effects, Glutaraldehyde was banned in Great Britain several years ago. Chlorine-based products are extremely corrosive and harmful if inhaled or swallowed. Alcohol-based products, which offer only modest antimicrobial performance, disintegrate plastics and are harmful if inhaled or swallowed.

Now consider that the new spore testing benchmarks required by the EPA to achieve sterilant (sporicidal) registration are far more rigorous today than the testing required of previously approved chemical sporicides. The new EPA spore testing protocols required STERIPLEX® Health Care to be tested against spore concentrations of nominally 100 times previous testing levels. Even so, STERIPLEX® Health Care passed all testing in record times. EPA Registration #84545-5 was issued to sBioMed™ November 2, 2009.

STERIPLEX® HEALTH CARE is registered as a broad spectrum Sterilant/Sporicide, Tuberculocide, and Bactericide.

While the current EPA registration of STERIPLEX® HEALTH CARE designates use as a hard surface sterilant, future applications of the safe STERIPLEX® technologies could include uses in state-of-the-art disinfection products for hospitals, schools, food processing, and antimicrobial cleaning products and even topical surgical prep and burn center treatments.
Seven U.S. patents have already been issued to sBioMed® and seven more U.S. patents are being processed for issuance. All patents have been filed globally.

Obama’s biotech strategy – letter from Linda

Dear Lyme friend,

On September 21, 2009, President Obama outlined his innovation strategy in
a speech in Troy, N.Y., after touring the technology classrooms of Hudson
Valley Community College.

“From biotechnology to nanotechnology, from the development of new forms
of energy to research into treatments of ancient diseases, there is so
much potential to change our world and improve our lives,” Obama said.

I feel that it is very irresponsible for the President to promote
nanotechnology when there are serious concerns about its safety and there
is virtually no regulation of the industry.

Last December, a report by the National Research Council found serious
gaps in the government’s plan for determining if nanomaterials pose a risk
and called for an effective national plan for identifying and managing
potential risks.

In a March 2009 commentary, a Lloyd’s of London analyst drew parallels
between the global financial meltdown and risks from nanomaterials. The
financial collapse reflected “blithe acceptance of complex products that
many didn’t understand.” With regard to nanomaterials, he commented that
“the importance of getting to grips with and quantifying complex sources
of risk has never been more obvious.”

I understand the EPA is considering taking a more precautionary approach
to nanomaterials. In the mean time, all consumers can do is try to avoid
them, especially the many nanotech foods and cosmetics. The problem is
that they are not labeled.

That is why I am happy to hear that the United States Department of
Agriculture’s National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) is considering an
official ban on nanotechnology in organic.

I am writing to the NOSB in support of the ban on nanotechnology. If they
pass it, I hope that you will ensure that the USDA’s National Organic
Program acts quickly to enforce it.

Sincerely,

Linda Heming

potentially harmful chemicals kept secret

Linda’s comment:  Use of potentially harmful chemicals kept secret under law…???  Sorry but this is criminal in my book….there is no wonder there are so many environmental cancers today.  What do you think this is doing to our children and grandchildren?  We are adults, we can read labels and do our own research, except in cases like this.  How dare they playing with our lives.  We elect them to be honest not hide behind some veil of secrecy!!  This is criminal in my books…Do they not know they are killing and exposing their own families, themselves??
 
Perhaps we should shove all these creeps in a moldy toxic room, spray it good with pesticides, herbicides and these other chemicals they are hiding, then feed them GMO foods with a diet soda chaser!!??  Wonder how many will keep their prostates?  How many will get lung, breast and stomach cancers?  Enough is enough, we the consumer have to stand up and SAY NO, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE….
 
All the more reason why we must focus on detoxing and following a lifelong daily detox program.
 
Regards,
Linda or Angel

Full article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/03/AR2010010302110_pf.html

Excerpt:

Of the 84,000 chemicals in commercial use in the United States — from
flame retardants in furniture to household cleaners — nearly 20 percent
are secret, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, their
names and physical properties guarded from consumers and virtually all
public officials under a little-known federal provision.

The policy was designed 33 years ago to protect trade secrets in a
highly competitive industry. But critics — including the Obama
administration — say the secrecy has grown out of control, making it
impossible for regulators to control potential dangers or for consumers
to know which toxic substances they might be exposed to.

At a time of increasing public demand for more information about
chemical exposure, pressure is building on lawmakers to make it more
difficult for manufacturers to cloak their products in secrecy. Congress
is set to rewrite chemical regulations this year for the first time in a
generation.

Formaldehyde Facts

 

Formaldehyde Facts
=================
 
Angel P. wrote:
 
DOn’t forget …from the Formaldehyde Institute other names it is known
as:
“…. Ivalon, Quaternium-15, Lysoform,
Formalith, BVF, Methylene oxide, Formalin, Morbicid, Methanal, Methyl
aldehyde, Oxomethane, Formic aldehyde, Fannoform, Fyde, Lofol,
Oxymethylene, Formol, and Superlysoform…”
 
Quaternium-15 is in almost EVERY cosmetic and hair care product
 
When we pick up a product at the local grocery store, most of us like to think we are getting something that has been tested and proven to be safe.  After all, we have laws to protect our health and safety, don’t we?  Actually, the government has very limited power to regulate manufacturers, or require testing of their products.
 
Here are some disturbing facts:
 
A product that kills 5-% of lab animals through ingestion or inhalation can still receive the federal regulatory designation non-toxic .  Of the 17,000 chemicals that appear in common household products, only 30% have been adequately tested for their negative effects on our health; less than 10% have been tested for their effect on the nervous system; and nothing is known about the combined effects of these chemicals when mixed within our bodies.  No law requires manufacturers to list the exact ingredients on the package label.
Personal care product refers to just about anything we use to clean our bodies or make ourselves look or smell good.  The closest thing to a regulatory agency for the personal care industry is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and their power is extremely limited.
Here are more unsettling facts regarding personal care products:
 
The FDA cannot regulate a personal care product until after it is released into the marketplace.  Neither personal care products nor their ingredients are reviewed or approved before they are sold to the public.
 
The FDA cannot require companies to do safety testing on their personal products before they are sold to the public.
 
The FDA cannot require recalls of harmful personal care products from the marketplace.
 
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and health (NIOSH) analyzed 2983 chemicals used in personal care products.  The results were as follows:
 
884 of the chemicals were toxic
314 caused biological mutation
218 caused reproductive complications
778 caused acute toxicity
148 caused tumors
376 caused skin and eye irritations.
 
Warning: You Can’t Trust Warning Labels! Continued